When carmakers offer a more affordable variant of a particular model, buyers know that it comes with less power and equipment. After all, since you’re paying a lower price, you must make compromises.
BYD, however, is bucking this trend with the ‘lighter’ version of its popular Atto 3 electric crossover. It’s a Cat A COE model that currently costs $20,000 less than its Cat B sibling, but with the same level of equipment.
Now, you’re probably thinking that there must be a catch, right? Impressively, there isn’t. The 100kW Atto 3 is the base model, but it’s arguably even more compelling than its sibling.
SPOT THE DIFFERENCES – IF YOU CAN
I walked up to the 100kW Atto 3 expecting to see things like smaller wheels or unpainted body panels, but there weren’t any. The entry-level Atto 3 is identical to the 150kW model.
LED head lights and taillights remain standard. You still get the same 18-inch wheels and 215/55 series tyres found in the more expensive model. And since the Atto 3 doesn’t have any badges to designate its powertrain’s state-of-tune, there’s no way to tell both variants apart.
Is there a downside to both variants looking identical? Frankly, no. From a consumer’s perspective, this is good news. Why should a car that offers even better value-for-money look pared-down to begin with, unless doing so is the only way to reduce its cost?
The Atto 3’s cabin styling is still polarising, but the infotainment is user-friendly and now comes with a voice command function.
Frankly, only folks who are into one-upmanship might think so, since they can’t proclaim that their Atto 3 is the more expensive Cat B model while they’re driving.
It’s the same story when you get behind the wheel – there’s nothing that differentiates the 100kW Atto 3 from the 150kW version, and again, this is good news.
You won’t suddenly find fabric seats, or a smaller infotainment display either. In fact, the screen can still be electronically rotated so users can choose either portrait (vertical) and landscape (horizontal) orientation to suit their preference.
Drivers can choose to rotate the screen to suit their preferred orientation.
Speaking of infotainment, BYD has upgraded the unit so it now has a voice command function. Just like the systems in the latest Mercedes-Benz and BMW models, you can say “Hi BYD” or simply “BYD” to prompt the system.
I found it useful to raise or lower the air-con temperature without needing to use the touchscreen, helping me keep my eyes on the road. However, the system did not respond to requests to increase or decrease the fan speed. I’m either not saying it right, or the function needs to be added.
The motor has been detuned to 132hp, well below the max limit for Cat A COE electric vehicles.
THAT SMALL CATCH
There was always going to be a catch with the base model Atto 3, but it does not come as a surprise. Obviously, to qualify for Cat A COE, the car’s power output had to be reduced. So, instead of 201bhp, the electric motor here produces 134bhp.
Correspondingly, the 100kW Atto 3’s century sprint time increases from 7.3 seconds to 9.7 seconds. But driving around Singapore, the dip in performance is negligible. Besides, the all-important torque figure still stands at 310Nm, and in an EV, this is available immediately.
That said, you should set the drive mode to either Normal or Sport for a snappier response. There’s nothing wrong with Eco, but many drivers will probably prefer the latter modes’ sprightlier feel and feedback.
With the same 60.5kWh Blade battery as the 150kW Atto 3, the Cat A Atto 3 has the same WLTP-Combined range of 420km. After covering 230km over three days, the remaining charge was 35% and the estimated driving range was 146km.
Had I continued driving, I would have covered just over 380km before needing to recharge. Half my mileage was from expressway driving, though, so perhaps more city driving, which results in more regenerative braking to recharge the batteries, would have extended the range.
STILL THE QUESTION: YAY OR NAY?
Yay. It’s hard not be swayed by the 100kW Atto 3, which is nearly identical in every way to the 150kW version except in terms of power. You get the same specifications, and more importantly, the same levels of safety, at a lower sticker price.
Quicker performance is the only reason to buy the more expensive variant. Even then, one should ask whether it’s worth forking out another $20,000 just to gain 2.4 seconds.
If you’re seeking a well-equipped electric crossover as a daily driver, then the Cat A Atto 3 is worth considering. Frankly, the only question at this point is: Why didn’t BYD introduce it earlier?
BYD Atto 3 100kW (A)
MOTOR Permanent magnet synchronous
MAX POWER 132hp
MAX TORQUE 310Nm
GEARBOX Single-speed
POWER TO WEIGHT 75.4hp per tonne
0-100KM/H 10.1 seconds
TOP SPEED 160km/h
BATTERY 60.5kWh
RANGE 420km
CONSUMPTION 6.25km/kWh
PRICE INCL. COE From $164,888
AGENT E-Auto
